IGEE at Yonsei University

Research and Activity Objectives and Content   This study focuses on Mapo-gu, Seoul, and aims to address local issues such as noise pollution, public transportation congestion, resident opposition to construction projects, and conflicts over waste incineration facilities between Mapo-gu and the Seoul Metropolitan Government. Using GIS analysis, the research seeks to propose policy solutions that balance the interests of residents, the environment, and businesses, incorporating ESG management principles.

Research and Activity Plans or Methodology   GIS maps will be created from both environmental and social perspectives. Income levels by administrative district will be compared using quantitative data, and living standards will be assessed through surveys. The two data sets will be layered on the GIS map to identify regional disparities. Areas with notable income and living standard gaps will be analyzed in connection with ESG management practices.

Field measurements will include traffic volume (at Sangam DMC entrance road, World Cup Buk-ro, and Gongdeok five-way intersection, recorded every 10 minutes on weekdays and weekends), noise levels (near resource recovery facilities, DMC roads, and residential areas), odors (observed near the incineration plant), air quality (checked via the AirKorea app), and heat island effects (comparing on-site and Korea Meteorological Administration temperatures).

Qualitative data will be collected through in-person interviews with residents, shop workers, and corporate CSR managers about living environment concerns. Surveys will also be distributed to 30–50 residents and workers in Gongdeok, Sangam, and Hapjeong, both on-site and digitally via QR code (Google Forms), to assess perceptions of noise, odor, environmental health impacts, and awareness of ESG activities.

Expected Effects and Follow-up Plans   By empirically identifying areas where sustainability and inequality coexist, this study defines the dual structure of urban environments and proposes policy directions to address it.

First, spatial analysis of overlapping environmental and social vulnerabilities will provide data to prioritize policy interventions and identify underserved areas. Second, qualitative research will capture the voices of residents previously excluded from policy processes, supporting the design of community-centered environmental policies and participatory governance. Third, by analyzing ESG practices among local businesses, public institutions, NGOs, and social enterprises, the study will assess the gap between corporate ESG contributions and community perception, suggesting ways to improve evaluation indicators and develop collaborative models with local governments. Finally, by revealing how sustainability and inequality arise from institutional imbalances in resource allocation, infrastructure access, and participation opportunities, the study will contribute to more equitable urban policy design. Based on the findings, it will also propose community education and outreach programs to enhance resident participation.